We are a team of engineers and researchers dedicated to building technology that handles the heavy lifting, so talented legal professionals can focus on the high-level strategy and advocacy their clients deserve.
Gauri leads strategy and product at Aliados AI. Currently a Data Scientist at the World Bank and a PhD candidate at Harvard University, she previously served as a Software Engineer at Meta, where she built Marketplace and Integrity products in London and the Bay Area.
Building on a technical foundation from Cornell, Gauri applies machine learning and optimization to complex challenges in public health and immigration. She is dedicated to engineering ethical, high-stakes frameworks that expand legal access through technical excellence.
Andres leads AI architecture at Aliados AI. Formerly a Machine Learning Engineer at Parsons and a Computational Physicist at Miami Cancer Institute, he has spent his career building automation software and predictive models for high-stakes, zero-error environments.
With an M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Andres specializes in building secure, multi-agent frameworks designed to move legal tech beyond simple demos and into high-stakes production environments.
Harris leads product strategy and service design at Aliados AI. A Partner at Ker-twang, he has spent 15 years solving complex systems challenges for organizations including IDEO, Juntos Global, and the Clinton HIV/AIDS Initiative.
He specializes in translating sophisticated AI architectures into intuitive, high-impact products, ensuring Aliados’ technology is grounded in deep human insight and proven cross-sector design.
Aliados AI was built on a simple belief: that the best legal minds should spend their time on the work only they can do.
Through our partnership with the University of Miami, we saw firsthand what happens when brilliant advocates are buried in document-heavy logistics and fragmented intake processes. We brought our background in software and AI architecture to bear on those specific problems — because reducing that friction means more clients served, more cases won, and more access to justice for the people who need it most.
We started with intake because that's where the friction begins. But the problem runs deeper, and so does our ambition.